Haymon d'Auxerre, "Expositio in epistolas Pauli" (Paris, vers 1460-1480)

Notice créée le 2024-11-26 à 08:18 par Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani (nruffini).

Haymon d'Auxerre, “Expositio in epistolas Pauli” (Paris, vers 1460-1480)

0184

Manuscrit complet

Vers 1460-1480

Paris (France)

ff. II-IIv, List of contents running through the liturgical year with the folio numbers of the appropriate lessons, rubric, Tabula contentorum in hoc volumine;

ff. 1-21, Haimo of Auxerre, Commentary on Galatians, incipit, “Primo querendum est in exordio huius epistole unde sint galathe … et per plateas tractus,” Explicit expositio in epistola ad galathas. Incipit expositio haymonis in epistola pauli apostoli ad ephesios;

ff. 21-45v, Commentary on Ephesians, incipit, “Ephesus est civitas asie et grecie … elices in secula seculorum manebunt,” Explicit exposito [sic] haymonis in epistola ad ephesios. Incipit expositio haymonis in epistola pauli apostoli ad philippenses;

ff. 45v-60, Commentary on Philippians, incipit, “Philippenses sunt macedones … in mente manebit et in corpora,” Explicit expositio epistole ad philipenses. Incipit expositio haymonis in epistola pauli apostoli ad colosenses;

ff. 60v-68v, Commentary on Colossians, incipit, “Misterium quod absconditum fuit… maneat semper vobiscum,” Explicit expositio epistole ad colosenses. Incipit expositio haymonis in epistola prima pauli apostoli ad thessalonicenses;

ff. 68v-77, Commentary on I Thessalonians, incipit, “Macedonia provincia est grecorum… de premio recte conversentur,” Explicit expositio epistole primie ad thessalonicenses. Incipit expositio haymonis in secundi epistola pauli apostoli ad thessalonicenses;

ff. 77v-81, Commentary on II Thessalonians, incipit, “Thessalonicenses accipientes priorem… cum omnibus vobis. Amen,” Explicit expositio epistole secunde ad thessalonicenses. Incipit expositio epistole prime ad timotheum;

English translation in S. R. Cartwright and K. L. Hughes, Second Thessalonians. Two Early Medieval Apocalyptic Commentaries. Haimo of Auxerre, Expositio in Epistolam II ad Thessalonicenses, Kalamazoo, 2001, pp. 21-33 (based on the Migne, Patrologia Latina edition). The editors stress that 2 Thessalonians is arguably the most significant theological source for the development of the doctrine of the Antichrist.

ff. 81-91v, Commentary on I Timothy, incipit, “Timotheus filius fuit mulieris … hactenus dixi,” Explicit expositio epistole primie ad timotheum. Incipit secunde;

ff. 92-100, Commentary on II Timothy, incipit, “Secundam epistolam timotheo scribit … que hactenus scripsi,” Explicit expositio epistole secunde ad timotheum. Incipit expositio epistole ad titum”;

ff. 100-102, Commentary on Titus, incipit, “Transiens apostolus a creta insula … et ihesu christo salvatore nostro, ” Explicit expositio epistole ad titum. Incipit ad philemonem”;

ff. 102v-107v, Commentary on Philemon, incipit, “Beato apostolo predicatione … dominus unus spriritus est,” Expositio epistole ad philemonem explicit. Incipit expositio haymonis in I. epistola pauli apostoli ad hebreos;

ff. 107v-190, Commentary on Hebrews, incipit, “In primordiis huius epistole dicendum est que causa … pertinigere mereamur. Amen,” Explicit expositio haymonis in epistolis pauli apostoli [followed by partially effaced inscription, see Provenance above]”;

Source : https://www.textmanuscripts.com/medieval/haymo-of-auxerre-91761?daterange=1499&country[]=france&inventorySearch=0&p=2

-

280 x 195 mm

193 fol.

Parchemin

TextManuscripts. Les Enluminures

2024-11-26

-

-

Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani, « Haymon d'Auxerre, “Expositio in epistolas Pauli” (Paris, vers 1460-1480) », in GUARD : Guarantee Unpreserved Archives Remain Documented, Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani et Sébastien de Valeriola (éds.), n° 0184, 2024, URL : https://guard.ulb.be/doku.php?id=notice:manuscrit:0184.