logos

Différences

Ci-dessous, les différences entre deux révisions de la page.

Lien vers cette vue comparative

notice:manuscrit:0184 [2024/11/26 08:18] – Créé depuis le formulaire creer nruffininotice:manuscrit:0184 [2024/11/26 08:20] (Version actuelle) – nruffini
Ligne 39: Ligne 39:
 ff. 77v-81, Commentary on II Thessalonians, incipit, “Thessalonicenses accipientes priorem…  cum omnibus vobis. Amen,” Explicit expositio epistole secunde ad thessalonicenses. Incipit expositio epistole prime ad timotheum; ff. 77v-81, Commentary on II Thessalonians, incipit, “Thessalonicenses accipientes priorem…  cum omnibus vobis. Amen,” Explicit expositio epistole secunde ad thessalonicenses. Incipit expositio epistole prime ad timotheum;
  
-English translation in S. R. Cartwright and K. L. Hughes, Second Thessalonians. Two Early Medieval Apocalyptic Commentaries. Haimo of Auxerre, Expositio in Epistolam II ad Thessalonicenses, Kalamazoo, 2001, pp. 21-33 (based on the Migne, Patrologia Latina edition). The editors stress that 2 Thessalonians is arguably the most significant theological source for the development of the doctrine of the Antichrist. +English translation in S. R. Cartwright and K. L. Hughes, Second Thessalonians. Two Early Medieval Apocalyptic Commentaries. Haimo of Auxerre, Expositio in Epistolam II ad Thessalonicenses, Kalamazoo, 2001, pp. 21-33 (based on the Migne, Patrologia Latina edition). The editors stress that 2 Thessalonians is arguably the most significant theological source for the development of the doctrine of the Antichrist.
  
 ff. 81-91v, Commentary on I Timothy, incipit, “Timotheus filius fuit mulieris … hactenus dixi,” Explicit expositio epistole primie ad timotheum. Incipit secunde; ff. 81-91v, Commentary on I Timothy, incipit, “Timotheus filius fuit mulieris … hactenus dixi,” Explicit expositio epistole primie ad timotheum. Incipit secunde;
Ligne 51: Ligne 51:
 ff. 107v-190, Commentary on Hebrews, incipit, “In primordiis huius epistole dicendum est que causa … pertinigere mereamur. Amen,” Explicit expositio haymonis in epistolis pauli apostoli [followed by partially effaced inscription, see Provenance above]”; ff. 107v-190, Commentary on Hebrews, incipit, “In primordiis huius epistole dicendum est que causa … pertinigere mereamur. Amen,” Explicit expositio haymonis in epistolis pauli apostoli [followed by partially effaced inscription, see Provenance above]”;
  
-Source : https://www.textmanuscripts.com/medieval/haymo-of-auxerre-91761?daterange=1499&country[]=france&inventorySearch=0&p=2+Source : [[https://www.textmanuscripts.com/medieval/haymo-of-auxerre-91761?daterange=1499&country[]=france&inventorySearch=0&p=2]]
  
 === Retranscription === === Retranscription ===
Ligne 83: Ligne 83:
 === Reproduction photographique === === Reproduction photographique ===
  
--+{{:notice:manuscrit:haymon_paris_1460_a.png?400}}  {{:notice:manuscrit:haymon_paris_1460_b.png?400}}
  
 === Pour citer cette notice === === Pour citer cette notice ===
  
-Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani, « Haymon d'Auxerre, "Expositio in epistolas Pauli" (Paris, vers 1460-1480) », in //GUARD : Guarantee Unpreserved Archives Remain Documented//, Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani et Sébastien de Valeriola (éds.), n° 0184, 2024, URL : https://guard.ulb.be/doku.php?id=notice:manuscrit:0184.+Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani, « Haymon d'Auxerre, "Expositio in epistolas Pauli" (Paris, vers 1460-1480) », in //GUARD : Guarantee Unpreserved Archives Remain Documented//, Nicolas Ruffini-Ronzani et Sébastien de Valeriola (éds.), n° 0184, 2024, URL : [[https://guard.ulb.be/doku.php?id=notice:manuscrit:0184]].